This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Also by tf86

Lots of teams schedule OOC cupcakes. ND certainly isn't unique in that regard. For purposes of brevity, let's take a look at the teams the committee apparently considered on the bubble: Duke, Harvard, ND and Ohio State. Sub-30 RPI OOC opponents from among that group:

Duke: High Point (32), Vermont (35), Manhattan (48).
Harvard: Michigan (45), Colgate (47), Fairfield (51), NJIT (71).
ND: Michigan (45), Marquette (49), Detroit (62).
Ohio State: Dartmouth (33 -- surprisingly high), Detroit (62), Cleveland State (66).

Looking at that, I would have to say that the bottom half of our OOC schedule didn't really hurt us (although I may have reached a different conclusion if Duke had made the field and we didn't.) Syracuse being uncharacteristically down this year may have hurt us, but we had no control over that.

I do think we didn't schedule enough games. Standing alone, that may not have been fatal -- after all, Harvard made the field while scheduling the same number of games, at an identical record. But I don't think it helped us.