This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Books. Hardcover, first edition, first printing but ... by Barney68

I do have some that don't meet those criteria; special cases as 'twer. An old Vonnegut, for example. I try to keep focused on modern stuff, mostly mysteries or spy stories or thrillers, but, again there are exceptions. Vonnegut ...

The author list is far too long to present but I'm particularly happy with my early Parkers and early Clancys (but Red October ain't among them). Most of the early Parkers and Clancys are signed. Almost all are in good enough condition to count as collectible.

All in all, a couple thousand volumes. I always have something to read.