This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

The economics seem complex by JohnThomas02

An optimistic outlook is that it allows MDs to pursue careers without debt to influence their decision. Will more lives be saved because fewer grads will think they need to chase money? Maybe that's naive? I'm not a doctor nor familiar with the landscape.

Maybe there will just be widening income/opportunity inequality. From a poster on Hacker News:
"...the most successful universities using their funds to subsidize those who would be fine without it. I was actually made aware of this by a wealthy Stanford alumni which has a fairly broad program for undergraduate tuition assistance. Graduates of mid/low tier universities seem more and more likely to have to compete with better credentialed people with lower debt."

Overall, NYU certainly gains from this move. More competition for med school slots, and the entire university gets great PR. Maybe that encourages more donations near term, and richer doctors in 10-20 years more likely to donate more. All benefits NYU.

So, should we expect other schools to follow suit? They may feel they have to if the trend gains some momentum.

As you say, undergrads could be especially well served in this regard. Maybe there'd be less pressure to pick a major based on ROI. Maybe more What Would You Fight For and fewer Wall Street careers - no offense to all you hedgies.

ND seems well positioned financially and ethically (at least in historical identity) to conduct such an experiment.

Do we want all the rich schools giving out free educations and leaving the poorer schools to struggle more than they already are?

It will be interesting to see how the economics play out.