This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
If only John Starks had been in the Bronco as well by knutesteen
He may then have missed game 7 on 6/22/94 and not shot 2 for 50 (OK, so it was 2 for 18) and the Knicks would have won their first championship since 1973, which they still seek, and Patrick Ewing would not be with Karl Malone and John Stockton among the best NBA players without a championship.
Yes, as a Knicks fan I was beside myself here in Austin watching the slow chase versus game 5, which the Knicks won. Still, even with Starks unable to hit the broad side of a barn, the Knicks only lost game 7 by 6 to Hakeem and the Rockets.