This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Looks to be the Porsche Reimagined by Singer of boats by hayesman_

I know nothing about boats but everything about van dam’s operation seems painstakingly great.

If you know nothing about Singer Porsche’s, they’re insane. The level of detail and quality that goes into every nut and bolt of the car is crazy. Their slogan is “everything matters” and it shows. Seeing one in person (the Milwaukee commission) changed the way I thought about car design/quality/detail/etc. And if you know nothing about cars, you’d just think it was a nice Porsche from 25 yards away...similar to van dam, they do a small amount of cars each year. Just bring them a donor 964 (the only generation Porsche they work on) and roughly $1m.