This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
If that comes to fruition, there is a silver lining: by pmcdnd96
More rum for us!
That article did raise a question for me: what is it with vodka drinks (or vodka drinkers?) that people want to re-use the name of the drink for 67 different recipes? The article referenced an endless stream of cosmopolitans. And consider the state of martinis - first, a real martini uses gin, so the term "vodka martini" is already wrong. But then they add all of these different syrups and crap, and people still call them martinis. The name of the drink becomes meaningless if you have to list every single ingredient for the bartender to make it.
Finally, before somebody else posts it:
