This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

You’re a better man than I am Gunga Din by FL_Irish

That’s probably the way things should work, but it’s just not what really happens in my experience. I have never once been part of a syllabus discussion in which the concept of two hours even came up. My sense is that most folks assign an amount necessary to achieve their learning objectives with some eye towards not overloading students but no specific thought to what it translates to in time.

I’m guessing there must be student survey data on this and I’d be curious to see what it shows. I certainly spent nowhere near two hour per credit on studying in the aggregate while at ND.