This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Why does winning some jackshit conference merit inclusion by someguy
into a championship situation?
Who cares about hypotheticals? Every team has 12 to 13 games to justify a position in the final 4. If they're in a weaker conference, then they need to schedule better OOC. If UCF honestly can't find teams to play (without a home and home reqt - tough shit UCF, maybe you have to play an away game without a home game in return), then maybe the answer is to have the NCAA intervene with scheduling incentives. The answer isn't to open the door to anyone with 2 losses because "what if they won every game in the playoff??"