This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Purdue's talent should be much better in next few years by jbrown_9999

since their recruiting has been upgraded from the previous regimes.

Brohm's last two classes have added more 4 stars (five) than they recruited from 2009 to 2017 (three). They have also stopped recruiting two star talent unlike the pre-Brohm years

2019 25th class 4 four stars
2018 51st class 1 four star

2017 72nd class 0 four stars (transition year)

2016 80th class 0 four stars
2015 67th class 0 four stars
2014 70th class 0 four stars
2013 61st class 1 four star
2012 49th class 2 four stars
2011 75th class 0 four stars
2010 53th class 0 four stars
2009 71st class 0 four stars