This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Don't draw any lines by TerryD
Coaches can leave at any time and can move from year to year if they so choose.
It is not a smart career move but there are no legal restrictions keeping them from moving. Restraint of trade and all of that.
How may "dream jobs" has Todd Graham had?
Why should there be any restrictions on player transfers when most football scholarships are renewed (or not) on an annual basis?
The whole sitting out a year transfer restriction just helps the schools and punishes the players. Coaches have no such restrictions.
I think that there should be no restrictions and kids should be able to transfer when and where they would like.
It seems so one sided to me, with 18-22 year old kids being restricted but adult university employees not so much.