This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

So long as a student athlete is on track to graduate by KeoughCharles05

within 4 years, transfers should be unlimited with no required period of ineligibility.

If the player is not on track to graduate, and transfers, the player should be athletically ineligible until such time as he or she gets back on track to graduate in the remaining period of athletic eligibility. The school from which the player transferred should still be on the hook for the scholarship (at least from a numbers standpoint) until the player gets back on track.

I'd also support declaring players athletically ineligible if they are not on track to graduate within their remaining period of athletic eligibility.