This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
You can go for 2 to win though by JBrock18
Which I believe both Reid and Shanahan would have done if they scored second. Taking the ball first was not smart. Shanahan brought up analytics and a “third possession”. Well analytics would have told him to go for 2 and the win. Shanahan has killed his teams in the Super Bowl 3 times as a play caller now. I hope he can get another chance soon but you just never know.
Knowing exactly what you need and how many downs to use on the one guaranteed possession you will get is far better than banking on getting a second possession.