Post Reply to Rock's House

This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:



HTTP Link (optional):

Poster's Email (optional):


Post being replied to

Do you think it's puff to increase Kelly's marketability? by tdiddy07

The only thing that would make sense to me is that Jack was open to change last year, but there was no demand for Kelly and the buyout was too big. I could conceivably see Jack trying to puff up the value of Kelly so Kelly has an 8-5 season and some program will take him off our hands.

I had that hope shortly after the SC game. But based on the complete jackassery of his public comments, the smug contempt for alumni dissension, and the misplaced institutional priorities and excuses for failure throughout the Kelly-era, that hope expired.