This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

But there’s more to consider. by sawingbatr

One thing not being taken into account in your analysis of whether Wimbush is the QB we thought we were getting when he chose ND is his lack of development. I agree if he changed teams at this point he would automatically be transformed into a Heisman candidate. However I believe a case could be made that not only has he not progressed as a player but he looks worse than he did when we all first saw him. BK is making him worse. It’s nit just the play calling that is abhorrent, it’s that we get players that would be stars playing elsewhere, but our beloved coach takes diamonds in the rough and turns then into turds.