This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
We have a lot more talent than Wisconsin by WilfordBrimley
has ever dreamed of. I am fairly certain Kelly's worst class was still better than Wisconsin's best class in the entire history of their program. Our recruiting and NFL production average is on par with Oklahoma and Clemson and Michigan and Auburn and Florida and so forth (and a little bit behind, in order, Alabama, Ohio State, FSU, UGA, and LSU) and is leaps and bounds ahead of the Wisconsins of the world.
Whether we have the talent, especially at the top end, to win national titles remains a question, but it's silly to compare us to Wisconsin. Given evenly matched coaching and player development, we would skull drag them every single year.