This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I struggled a bit with Book's placement on the list by Jvan

If he were a more dynamic passer (e.g., ability to effectively throw the long ball), I would have placed him higher. As it stands, I elevated the guys who are certain early-round NFL draft picks. The counter argument is the severe drop-off from Book to his back-up, which impacts the team's chances of winning.

In the past we've always defaulted to the best pure football players in any tiebreaker, so that's what I did here. This is also why I ran out of room for the specialists, which I agree doesn't seem right. Yoon made the cut last year, although he was regarded as a difference maker.