This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Swarbrick tells a lot of fibs by Old Fogey

Even if you concede the first two points as true, though I have my doubts Jenkins would have allowed an interviewee for one of the most important jobs at the university to go on for half the interview discussing how well the Big Ten was doing something, points three, five, and six are clearly either an exaggeration, or out-right lie. Regarding the point about leaving $20mm annually on the table by being independent, seems a little odd to me that one would publicly disclose such information if true, as it surely would weaken our negotiating ability if we ever decided we needed to join a conference.