This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
A few questions about the USC game by Bruno95
Saturday was an overall strong offensive performance. Some play designs and playcalling sequences were lacking. But ND made up for it by bullying USC off the ball. 300 yards rushing is great. Tony Jones beat their ass. The offensive line beat their ass. That makes three in a row against USC. 7-3 for Kelly.
Is that not the consensus? Would it therefore be a lie to characterize the reaction here as uniformly negative? Would it be disingenuous to paste portions of sentences and posts out of context to try to make that point? Would a “blog” devoted to such a premise be bullshit?
Correct me if I’m wrong. Let us know if you’re pissed about beating USC again.