This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
one thing that pissed me off Saturday on TV by ocdomer78
was all of the shots of the SC band idiots with their shades on ( an idea which I am sure they stole from the Stanford band years ago), but I digress.
what really pissed me off was thinking about next year in Los Angeles when you will not see our band. Why? because our band does not come to LA. For whatever we are too cheap to send our band to LA (they were not at Georgia either).
I know the following:
1. our team is better
2. our band is better
3. our endowment is larger
so ..... why can SC send their band and we cannot? They should be saving for all of the litigation they will need to settle yet they still send their band.
we should be embarrassed.