This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Not really sure what your point is. by goldhelmethead

As a redshirt Soph he is within 5 and 12 pounds of two of the three players you mentioned, should those weights be correct including Correll's.
If he is a legit 6'3 300lb'er that is not small as SEE pointed out.

IMO the staff must see something they like. They do of course have options with Grunhard and Lugg. Correll has been the backup/understudy to Patterson this year. I don't know if he is physically ready to play a full game and maybe the staff rotates. Lugg did some snapping in the Spring and obviously has a better grasp of coverage's etc. with his time in the program at Guard and Tackle.

The Bottom line is it sucks to lose Patterson. Especially down the stretch in a season like this.