This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

In football I think they should be worried. IMO, the larger by VaDblDmr

question is whether non-SEC conferences will accept that football is going to have to be separated from current conference affiliations. The sooner non-SEC conferences act on that, the better off they will be.

The good thing, I suspect, is that the ACC, Pac-12, and remaining Big XII schools all, I think, will quickly grasp that. In contrast, I suspect the B1G will resist it. But the bottom half of the B1G simply isn't on par in terms of fan interest with the bottom half of the SEC. Not by a long shot.