This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Why move a top center in NCAA? by Btd
Unless Correll is even better than Patterson, it strikes me as taking away a lock at center and moving him to guard where he will be ok, but not as good as he was at center. You go from A at center to B+ and then your A center is a B or B+ guard.
To me, leave Patterson alone. Get the best 2 of kristoff, Rocco, and Lugg onto the field at guard. Correll then is a backup.
Patterson is listed by some as the top returning center in NCAA. Now if 2 of those other 3 are at best B- guards, then maybe the average is higher with this move. I think they stand a good chance of being B or higher.