This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I only watched the third period by wearendhockey

I was wondering a bit about how the first two periods looked based on some of the commentary. Sure they hit the post a few times in this game, but the 20 minutes I saw were pretty much controlled by the Irish. And it wasn't like it was 4-0 going into the third when it should be fairly easy to control tempo. Notre Dame was winning battles in corners and coming up with far more than half of the 50-50 pucks in the third period, when it was 2-0, 3-0 and 4-0, and at both ends of the ice.