This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
I'll play. by BabaGhanouj
I may be way off because I don't know enough history of women's basketball. However, here is how I think. We have some big clues:
1. active coaches
2. "more than 3 Final Fours"
3. "wait a minute…that can't be right, could it?"
4. Plus, why ask the question, unless the answer is not so obvious?
So Geno, Muffet, and Tara make 3. (I know enough about the history of women's basketball for those.)
Next come to mind are Dawn and "he who shall remain nameless". but how long have they really been around? Here is where I keep thinking of "more than 3". Why more than 3? Do those two coaches have 3 Final Fours or less?
I'm probably forgetting someone (or more) but I'll say just those 3.
Oops, how about Baylor? Oh well I'll still go with just those 3.