This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Thx. Do You Have a Link or Copy.... by dillon77
...that that story and/or quote? Would be interested in seeing if she says anything else.
After having read AA's article (posted above), I see that MM specifically cites grad transfers. That makes sense in that they'd be available immediately and just for one year, so Mik Vaughn and Danielle Cosgrove can get more experience, get some "veteran" input and then make way for -- knock on wood -- the 2020 posts (Marshall? Watson?).
The regular transfer route still mostly requires that year sit out (save for the 14 percent Raoul's research indicated for this year). Don't think that kind of transfer would help for 2019-20.
Stay tuned...