This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Good game plan by UConn by Orange_Irish
We can play better.
UConn did a better job of exploring match ups against us.
Shep and Mabrey got beat on drives too many times. And Arike played some matador D at times too.
Conversely, we weren’t patient with our matchup advantages - feeding Bri and Jackie (when KLM was on her).
We also got out worked on the defensive glass in particular at key moments.
These are all areas that can be fixed with more focus the next time they play
On the plus side, I liked what I saw from Patterson and her continued development alone will have us in better shape when we meet again