This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
More kudos to Muffet by txirish74
for taking the long term view. Sure, it's nice to beat a team by 50, but at the end of the day, does it do you an y good as opposed to beating by 25 and having your starters out for the 4th quarter? At a minimum, in decreases the chance for a starter to get injured. Strategically, getting minutes for the younger players not only develops depth but also helps build the team for next year. I hope we do this all year, get to the Tournament healthy and fresh, and kick the **** out of the field.