This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Owners by hempfield75

I thought that was one of the conditions of establishing the WNBA. They
finance the WNBA and control interest. Am I wrong on that? I thought one
of the sticking points by owners was WNBA salaries had to be maintained
at a certain level. Am I way out in left field on this?

...If that is not the case. What is keeping the salaries at a ridiculous
low amount.

...This is really a sad point. Before I retired. I was making more money
than Breanna Stewert and any other WNBA star coming out since. I am not
shy to say I was a supervisor with the Post Office.

SEG/Chief