This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Help me understand what you mean with ... by CJC
"... since 2 of them are coached by men."
I agree with much of what Muffet has said about women and opportunities in athletics and in leadership beyond athletics.
But I'm not sure what that has to do with how next year's team will fare in the ACC or otherwise.
The only team to defeat Notre Dame in the ACC tournament was coached by a man. Obviously, Geno Auriemma has won far more than he's lost against Muffet. So you can't mean to suggest that male coaches are incapable of defeating Muffet, can you?
Or do you think that given her strong feelings about opportunities for women, she coaches harder or better against men than she does against women?
Help me here.