This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Don't forget the pick and roll. If Mik can be reliable down by Domerduck
low, move around the perimeter, and pass out when doubled they could be as effective as Oregon. They only have Ruthie who stays down low and the other 4 can shoot threes big time (all +40%). They've had this offense for three years and got to at least the Elite 8 all of those years. It helps when you have a magician like Sabrina on the ball often but maybe Peoples or Nixon can play that role. You also need those perimeter players to crash the boards and play D on low post players since many teams have multiple bigs.
It could work but it's not Muffet's offense.