This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
In the tournament, which of the starting five should by sixtythreer
Muffet have put on the bench to give Patterson more playing time? In which game should she have done it? Baylor? Stanford? Which?
Was Dani a better player than Arike? Jackie? Bri, Jess, Marina?
Was the goal to win the National Champtinship or play second-team players? It has been argued
that Dani paid her dues. Had not all the first-team players paid more?
As Domer65 has aptly said, we were being beaten by a better (and hotter) team until Cox went down. We rallied and lost by a point. Sure I would have been delighted with the win. But it can be fairly said that Baylor deserved it. I was darn proud of our team.