Post Reply to McGraw's Bench

This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

Message:

HTTP Link (optional):

Poster's Email (optional):

 


Post being replied to

The Princeton by hempfield75

I see some positives and negatives in as a primary system.

...Mik was probably our worst ball handler last year. She would be
a hindrance in the Princeton. While Cosgrove, Sam, and Campbell would
be weapons.

...That does not count the magic the guards like Anaya, Gilbert, Jordan,
and possibly Clark or the Stanford PG could bring to the team.

...A couple of negatives that can be fixed. One. Brand new team with no
starters and do not know each other. Will take time to learn and get the
timing down..

...The other one could be Abby. She also was not the best ball handler and
shooter. Could the Princeton reduce her role?

...If we are fortunate to get the Stanford PG as GT would she only have
1 or 2 years of eligibility? Her is a trick question. Would she qualify
academically at ND? Just kidding. LOL.

...The Princeton does make a lot of sense if we can not get a Post GT.
We do have the guards that are use to the ball handling. I am feeling
a lot more comfortable about the Princeton after your post. I just have
concerns about the role Mik would play. Not a shooter or ball handler. Her
minutes could be like hers and Dani's the past couple years.

SEG/Chief