This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Remembering the frustration of coming so close so often by CKDexterHaven
in the NCAA Tournament when the opponents were able to score so frequently with their bigs and get second shots. There are many ways a "smaller" team can score its own points, but not being able to defend the opponents' bigs seemed to often be the deciding factor. That was a hard lesson and I hope it still motivates the effort to go after players who can defend tall opponents and who can rebound effectively. Tall scorers are nice to have, but a lack of tall defenders/rebounders makes it much more difficult to win championships.