This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
I'm not sure any one model guarantees a National by sixtythreer
Championship. I recall the 2019 tournament game between Oregon and Baylor. Baylor won by 5, but it was tied at 67 with 55 seconds to go. Baylor clearly had the inside size advantage with Cox and Brown. but Oregon had three very dangerous three-point shooters. And Hebard had nine boards. And Ionescu ...
How dangerous would a team be with a Hebard and four 40% three-point shooters?
I assuming that this hypothetical team would take care of the ball, stay close in rebounding, make their free throws at a respectable rate, etc.
In 2021-22 how good is our three-point shooting going to be?