This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Here is where I am at by HTownND
Chelsea has played 16 matches and has 32 points. 2 points per match is a pretty good number, and they are already 12 points adrift.
Moreover, City has played Man U and Chelsea already and showed that they are better on the pitch.
City isn’t fattening up on the bottom of the table. They have played the other contenders and won.
Sure there is a lot of football, but the only thing that will slow them is a rash of injuries. This isn’t a reverse jinx either, I’m just really impressed watching them. They truly are a step above everyone else.