This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Good Coaching by RyanShaySalvo
My brief synopsis of the match as viewed from my MacBook Air:
1. Stony Brook are well coached; not the same calibre of player as the Irish but they are not chopped liver.
2. For most of this match the Irish tried to bully Stony Brook, lost their patience repeatedly, and squandered what looked to be nicely developing opportunities to break down their opponent. But they are relentless in attack with difference makers coming from multiple angles, which is exciting to see.
3. I am guessing the Irish have run the sequence that led to the goal a bunch of times in training. They were calm, did not rush themselves, were obviously reading their keys, and executed like a good team should. That has to be on the coaching staff.