This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Our 'U' teams are better than they have ever been by wcnitz
And, apparently, our really young teams - the kids who are 13-15 - routinely go to Europe and hold their own. A kid from our club who's now part of ODP went over with a bunch of U14s last summer and did very well in England. This is pretty typical now.
One issue that I hear a lot, though, is the comfort level of soccer here in the US. Everybody knows soccer is pay-to-play here and it keeps a lot of kids out, but there's another aspect to it. An American 16-17 year old trying to make an academy team? It's soccer or...college. Not life or death. Probably a degree. In other countries? Soccer or nothing at all. It plays a role. Hell, just look at Ronaldo's story.