This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Might be a dumb question but... by GoldCoastIrish
As I understand it, FCB is relatively majority owned by club members.
Is the debt held by the operating entity, and if so, would a reduction in membership lead to a reduced ability to service the debt?
Obviously Barca has a rabid fanbase and probably a long list to get season tix, so the people will pay, but is the debt getting serviced out of that membership revenue? Obviously they pull CL money every year so that likely helps, but they're looking at 10 years to pay it off at a minimum.
(My gunners are subject to the whims of a greedy owner who won't invest, sadly.)