This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Brey always preaches that he likes "old" teams by DawsonMayes871
If that's the case, you should always be recruiting guys that are willing to sit for a year or two and develop. Sure, you swing for the fences each year and try to get elite talent that can contribute right away, but there's no excuse for having an empty class.
You can't have it both ways where you say "hey, I have no playing time to offer" and then complain that you have to play younger guys. For whatever reason he's gotten away from having the Russell Carter/Jack Cooley/Matt Farrell types that come in and wait their turn.