This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
So to be clear... by El Kabong
...it's your position the Big 10 or the SEC or the Pac12 or the Big12 would have signed a deal with Notre Dame saying that in exchange for an average of five games per year scheduled against their teams, Notre Dame would get full access to all of their bowl slots and a place for all their non-FB teams to play.
If that's your position, suffice it to say I disagree.
And also suffice it to say all those conference have dogmeat teams ND would have to play as part of any of those hypothetical deals. That you prefer those dogmeat teams to the ACC's dogmeat teams really isn't relevant to the conversation.