This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Why does the Sox structure matter? by dfw
Yes, he's the managing partner and the remaining partners get nothing from their investment unless it's sold. They do get access to a box at the park and a golden ticket to get into any MLB game as any MLB owner gets.
My statement was that no public money should go to the build a new park. And then, if they are dumb enough to give money to the project, then it should be on the condition that Reinsdorf sells.
I understand the money wouldn't directly go to Reinsdorf, but if the state pays for part of the project it is equivalent to giving money to Reinsdorf.