Other than a non-compete imposed on the business owner

Other than a non-compete imposed on the business owner
by mwalsh (2024-04-23 23:16:38)

In reply to: Did he/she sell a practice and that was part of the posted by Raoul

Who sells their business, what are other appropriate cases? They seem to be too broadly overused in two respects. First, requiring them for employment, generally. Second, two entities doing business together and colluding in their commercial contract to not poach each other’s employees. I understand the latter is a non-solicit but the health care industry is a huge fan of both for a similar purpose.

Replies:

Some sales roles - ndtnguy 2024-04-24 09:53:25
- When the company relies on the magnetism of one person - KeoughCharles05 2024-04-24 11:08:15
  - In the latter case - ndtnguy 2024-04-24 11:20:20
    - Sure, my point is that the interest in the company - KeoughCharles05 2024-04-24 11:47:30
      - That's not really the case - ndtnguy 2024-04-24 11:57:09
    - Repeating what was said elsewhere in the thread, pay less - Grace91 2024-04-24 11:28:21
      - That's a fairly odd understanding of contract negotiations - ndtnguy 2024-04-24 11:59:29
        Obviously I am not an attorney. I have however been impacted - Grace91 2024-04-24 12:58:53
- Nothing is preventing the employer from incentivizing the - Grace91 2024-04-24 10:22:31
  - how much company resources were used... - flapjack 2024-04-24 10:49:20
    - The problem is that businesses have, can, and will continue - Grace91 2024-04-24 11:06:09
Another legitimate case could be in the event of training - KeoughCharles05 2024-04-23 23:56:36
- That exception seems subject to being too broadly applied - mwalsh 2024-04-24 00:29:35
  - Certainly - KeoughCharles05 2024-04-24 10:56:25