And a smart phone.
specifically, Russia wanting nuclear weapons in space
They want to place into orbit nuclear armed killer satellites.
well in that trail run that set the wildfires in California.
Laser sharks!!!
to see if Donny would let them "do whatever the hell they want."
ETA: Nukes in space could be very bad for global communications and other satellite-dependent operations.
A nuke test by the US in the 1960s (Starfish Prime) damaged electrical systems in Hawaii, some 900 miles away, and radiation belts caused by the detonation damaged satellites even months later.
I've never seen any classified information on this, so all of the following is unclassified or speculation.
A huge chunk of our space capability is in Low Earth Orbit. More is arriving every day, e.g., Starlink. A lot of military capability is there as well. And there are plans for much, much more (link).
Those birds are designed for the radiation environment that exists now inside the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Should one create a nuclear explosion, especially one with tailored subatomic particle production, the resulting environment could "age out" lots of those birds within very short timelines. Deploying an armed vehicle in LEO would destabilize things because we are highly dependent on those satellites and the Russians far less so.
They do not have to actually launch a satellite or pop a nuke. Simply changing the rules so that one is ready and able to do so on a very short timeline, say hours to days, is enough. Responding to that threat takes much, much longer.
There was a proposed mission some years ago, and I can't remember much about it, that had some kind of a chemical in canisters that would be fired off, conventional explosive or rocket, to put the chemical all over the LEO space. The idea was that this chemical, boron, maybe?, would absorb the subatomic particles and mitigate the effects of someone popping a nuke, at least for the LEO environment. It got cancelled early, I don't remember why.
overtime.
They will need to inform the public soon in at least some detail. Otherwise, the rumor mill will have the Russians imminently launching a Death Star.
Republicans will counter that the threat may come across the mexican border
...it is just a matter of time.
aid to Ukraine, I'm all for it.
my first thought is "first strike capability". I'm all for destabilizing them.
…in Ukraine. Could just be a coincidence but proof of concept of a Mach 9 hypersonic missile capability that was originally developed for sea-based launch could be the type of destabilizing first strike capability you mention. If it can be successfully launched from subs with a range of 625 miles (as reported in the linked article), a lot of U.S. cities and other targets could be in the crosshairs.
Why wait, why take the risk? That’s why we have them. To use them.
"One of the sources who has seen the intelligence confirmed that 'it is, in fact, a highly concerning and destabilizing' Russian capability 'that we were recently made aware of.'"
all Americans, I'm wondering if it is a cyber technology.
the White House tomorrow.
Doesn't sound like a "has to be dealt with today" thing.