Inflation as a relative metric may have been tamed
by El Kabong (2024-02-26 19:16:14)

In reply to: What exactly has Biden done to disgust you?  posted by vermin05


Let me know when prices are going to go back down to the original 2% a year graph line, because they ain't close right now.


Going back to 2% just means that price increases have slowed
by EricCartman  (2024-02-27 09:15:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

We would need deflation to go back to where prices were before CPI exploded.


I think you have misread ElK
by ufl  (2024-02-27 14:15:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

He's not talking about return to the level of prices just before inflation rose above 2%. He's talking about graphing where prices would be if we had experienced 2% every year since then and getting the actual price line to intersect that line at some point.

We could, in principle do this by having 1% inflation for some period of time. However, I agree that a monetary policy which would produce that would probably be accompanied by a recession.


That is indeed what I meant *
by El Kabong  (2024-02-27 15:38:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


It does go both way though
by DBCooper  (2024-02-27 16:31:38)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

inflation from 2008 to 2021 was well below historical averages. So we were due for some catch up. Certainly, not what we have seen in 2022 and 23.


That’s not the defined policy goal
by ufl  (2024-02-27 06:22:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

on the part of the Federal Reserve and probably shouldn’t be.


FWIW, the Fed's website includes an FAQ on the 2% target.
by EricCartman  (2024-02-27 09:03:28)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Whether this is official policy or not, it is certainly the public expectation of the ideal inflation rate, since it is often cited as our official inflation target.


Yes. They toyed with this when they spent
by ufl  (2024-02-27 09:17:38)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

years trying to get the inflation rate up to their target even with zero interest rates.

Two points: They never came up with a definition of "longer run" and this was to be the (vague) policy when they missed the target on the down side.

I think that discussion is moot. We're back to the "two percent and bygones are bygones" formulation which we've had since they set a numerical target in the 1990's.

Targeting


Inflation is not a measure of where prices are now to where
by enduff  (2024-02-26 21:30:23)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

They were three years ago. Also real wages are higher - meaning wages are outpacing inflation, which is the most important measure


They were 1.4% off that 2% in 2023
by sprack  (2024-02-26 21:19:19)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

In fact the rate in 2023 was virtually the same as the rate in 2005.

The lowest inflation rate outside of the Great Recession was in 2015 under Barack Obama. Since the middle of the Reagan administration the inflation rate has had little to do with which party controlled the White House. It had far more to do with who chaired the Federal Reserve.


Biden renominated Powell.
by EricCartman  (2024-02-26 21:42:24)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

He could have dump him for someone less dovish. Instead, we got transitory and inflation.


Who was first nominated by Trump *
by sprack  (2024-02-27 11:43:14)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


Strange reply.
by EricCartman  (2024-02-27 12:01:24)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Biden could have dumped Powell, and Biden should have dumped Powell after Powell let Trump bully him around.

Don't worry, when Powell was renominated Biden had full confidence that Powell would keep inflation under control. Ya know, until Powell lost control of inflation and CPI exploded.

“I’m confident that Chair Powell and Dr. Brainard’s focus on keeping inflation low, prices stable, and delivering full employment will make our economy stronger than ever before. Together, they also share my deep belief that urgent action is needed to address the economic risks posed by climate change, and stay ahead of emerging risks in our financial system,” Biden said.

In July of 2020 Powell famously said "We’re Not Even Thinking About Thinking About Raising Rates" last year, Powell said that the Fed is "not thinking about rate cuts right now at all". Powell has been behind the curve at every step of his tenure. He deserves to get the boot, and should have gotten the boot in 2021.


Inflation was worldwide
by sprack  (2024-02-27 16:12:39)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

How people think a depression could have been avoided without stimulating the economy during Covid is beyond rational comprehension.

And I was just stating a fact that Trump nominated Powell, because, well, he did, and unlike many of his appointments, he actually appointed a guy well-qualified for the job.


July of 2020, CPI was 1%
by DBCooper  (2024-02-27 12:15:51)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

and right in the middle of covid. Did he say that in July, 2021? I dont remember timeline

The Fed is almost always is behind the curve a little bit, they are never going to try to front run economic data. That is for the market.


My issue is more of that comment was tone deaf.
by EricCartman  (2024-02-27 14:18:04)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

The Fed unleashed trillions in liquidity, PPP was pushed out, and the vaccine was on the horizon. Did we need bravado from the Fed Chair? What was the point of declaring an absolute position? Then, he did it again just a few months ago.

The transitory timeline also really annoys me. Powell was slow to acknowledge reality, and extremely slow to start QT.

I'm failing to see the justification for giving him another term. He's not Burns bad, and he isn't Volcker great. He is also below Greenspan and Bernanke (who I also have issues with).

I'm starting to believe that we need to overhaul monetary policy. We place too much emphasis on the Fed's every move and statement. It reeks of central planning, and we need to devise a better system. Maybe embrace AI and let an algorithm set interest rates. Friedman proposed it decades ago, so the idea was been around for a long time (under less advanced technology).


Not sure how you fill out the scorecard *
by ufl  (2024-02-27 15:31:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


I dont think it would have mattered.
by DBCooper  (2024-02-27 10:55:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

No one was going to raise rates as fast as we probably needed right away and if we did that might have forced a recession. And once Powell got going he raised them quite quickly. We got to 4.5% by end of 2022 and after onyl starting in March of that year, and once the markets saw the Fed meant business you started to see inflation come down (obviously the supply chain issues slowly getting fixed and fear of Russia vs Ukraine waning helped too). If we started a few months earlier, say in the summer of 2021, I doubt it would have mattered that much in the grand scheme of things. No one would have raised rates 300 bps in 6 months with CPI in the 4s and 5s. They would have started slowly and that never would have been enough to restrict the oncoming inflation surge. Plenty of people were predicting future inflation, but no one was suggesting 7-9%. I agree Powell was slow to raise and stupidly wanted to wait until the bond purchasing was over before raising, but going from 0- to say 1% rate by March of 2022 would not have done much, IMO. It probably would only had meant that they would not raise 75bps 3 times in a row.

I think Powell has done a pretty good job if he is able to soft land this thing and possibly avoid a recession. At the very least he certainly pushed it down the road months to even years past when every economist on the planet predicted it was going to happen.


To get absolute price reductions
by AquinasDomer  (2024-02-26 21:03:16)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

You'd need to enter a pretty bad recession or even depression.

I doubt either winner will do better than stabilize at 2% over their term.


It’s not that far off, but we will see on Thursday
by DBCooper  (2024-02-26 19:57:52)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

PCE comes out and that is more important than CPI.

I would not get too freaked out about Januarys CPI. January tends to have some weird seasonality that makes it a bit volatile compared to expectations (especially in jobs numbers). Doesn’t mean you discount it, but wait to see a little more evidence first before becoming worried.