In reply to: No Labels officially fizzles (link) posted by sprack
And the Idea that the VP choice from the opposite party would balance the ticket ignores that people don’t vote for vice president.
They said they did not want to be spoilers and were only interested in winning, but there was zero chance of such a ticket winning.
Some rich people sure wasted a lot of money on nothing. It’s dead and gone, won’t even be a footnote in the history of this campaign.
Lastly, I’d have to think long and hard to come up with a dumber name than “No Labels”.
I'd never want that label to go away.
… (a brief while, I believe) a “get stuff done party”