Looks like it was a waste of perfectly good drones and
by sprack (2024-04-14 05:02:10)

In reply to: Uh oh. Here comes Iran. *  posted by The Holtz Room


missiles in the end.


Yep, this was always the plan
by wcnitz  (2024-04-14 08:20:25)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Launch of a bunch of useless crap at Israel, Israel shoots most of it down, claim internally through controlled media that you've fully retaliated and killed X number of Israelis.

I don't know why people were worried about this situation, Iran isn't capable of anything else.


The missiles and drones were not useless crap
by 88_92WSND  (2024-04-14 10:58:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

After Sulamani was killed in 2020, the Iranians launched a dozen ballistic missiles at a US facility in Iraq, injuring over 100 soldiers. Back in January, in response to the bomb attack in Kerman, the Iranians used similar systems to strike at militant camps in Pakistan, killing or injuring a number of people. Iranian drones have killed three US service members and a defense contractor, and wounded dozens of others. An Iranian drone attack in 2019 took half of Saudi oil refining capacity off line. And it is Iranian drones which are killing Ukrainians and destroying Ukrainian infrastructure on a daily basis.

Never mind how much all of the defense missiles cost. It was a great advertisement for the Arrow system, but those suckers ain't cheap.


They clearly were
by wcnitz  (2024-04-14 12:58:35)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

This wasn’t an “attack”, it was handbags at 20 paces.


I don’t understand this thought
by ndsapper  (2024-04-16 00:36:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Over 120 ballistic missiles, accompanied by drones launched to arrive at same time, and it wasn’t a serious attack meant to do significant damage? Iran would have to have incredible faith in Israel/coalition defense systems, faith we ourselves do not have, to think not one would reach a target causing significant loss that garners an equal response. It isn’t logical.

I do think they thought it would be relatively limited due to the air defense, but certainly not as ineffective as it was, in fact that was probably unsettling. But they had a communications plan, this was retaliatory in nature, hard but finite, and now we’re even.

They are not as big a foe, nor as isolated a regime, as we prop them up to be.


I didn't know that useless crap would require a coalition
by airborneirish  (2024-04-15 20:20:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

to defend against. If that ordinance were fired at you and you had no defense you would see fairly quickly how useful it was. If you want I would be happy to push you out of a c-17 with a parachute over a portion of ukraine that receives constant shelling and drone attacks. You can report back on how useless that ordinance is.

Don't mistake as useless those attacks deflected by a better defense.


Russia doesn’t advertise the drones
by DBCooper  (2024-04-14 12:12:37)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

And have them fly hours to their destination.

I don’t think the drones are useless, but this attack was done purely to save face and to allow Israel (and others) to easily shoot them out of the sky.

As Robert McNamara once said, when talking about the Cuban blockade, “This is language. A new vocabulary, the likes of which the world has never seen”.

And they are certainly expensive, but with all the oil they are selling to China, Irans economy is doing just fine


The expense was on the US, UK, and Isreali side
by 88_92WSND  (2024-04-14 12:33:04)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

using missiles to shoot down the drones, not with the drones.

As to flying time -- it's only about an hour more flying time from Iran to Israel as it is from Russian territory to key targets in Ukraine. Even if the move is telegraphed, it still requires 100% success on defense to keep hundreds of pounds of explosives from hitting or crashing in Israel. The link below shows pictures of what happens when a small Iranian drone hit a merchant vessel (killing the captain and a crew-member)


and thats pretty much what we got
by DBCooper  (2024-04-14 14:14:32)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

99% success rate.

As I said below, if Iran really wanted to maximize damage it is not that hard for them. Have Hezbollah send in a volley of rockets right before the drones and missiles from Iran are about to get close to Israel's airspace. Overwhelm the Iron Dome and you would have a much lower success rate (Hezbollah reportedly has enough rockets to get through the dome by themselves anyway).

The reason why they didn't do that is pretty telling in my mind. I'm hoping Israel recognizes this is just a response to save face, as I think it's clear our government does, and does not escalate this any further. Heck, Iran even said that it was a retaliation to the Israel attack last week and its now over.


And they are finite and must be replaced *
by airborneirish  (2024-04-14 11:22:11)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


Million dollar missile shoots down $300 drone… *
by SEE  (2024-04-14 21:19:18)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


They ain’t no $300 drones *
by sprack  (2024-04-16 14:00:48)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


Source for the $300 figure? I'm seeing $200K, $300K. *
by Kbyrnes  (2024-04-15 10:16:49)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply


The decision not to prepare for UNREP of SM2 VLS
by 88_92WSND  (2024-04-14 12:04:21)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

is going to bite the Navy in the ass... having to drive your boat back to port to reload is a tactical nightmare.

Luv ya' Across

UNREP - underway replenishment
SM2 - one of the SAM used for air and ballistic missile defense
VLS - vertical launch System


I agree completely. This reeks of a coordinated response
by dulac89  (2024-04-14 10:39:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

I suspect the extent and nature of the attack and Israel’s response were largely communicated ahead of time. At the very least, I ran was telegraphing exactly the nature of its attack and made little to no attempt to use basic combined tactics to increase the lethality of the strike. This allows them to respond while simultaneously minimizing the chance that it escalates

And Russia needs Iranian support to continue in Ukraine. Iran can’t provide them that support and fight a war with Israel that will be heavily backed by the United States


I slightly disagree
by DBCooper  (2024-04-14 09:07:56)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

It is a big change for Iran to launch from their own land. It certainly is a move to appease their hardliners while also giving the biggest heads up to Israel that missiles and drones were on their way. It seems to be done to save face, while limited the need for Israel to have a severe response.

But, if Iran really wanted to do something they would unleash Hezbollah who have enough rockets to overwhelm the iron dome. This is not the best Iran can do. They are capable of much more. But, It’s what they are most willing to do at this time, IMO.

This is all a big game and Iran is just slightly escalating within the unwritten rules. Hopefully Israel continues with a mostly measured response and just hits back at some mostly useless Iranian military targets or even none Iranian land targets.


Seems like that's how they responded. Took out some
by krudler  (2024-04-14 13:34:49)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

proxy weapons depots not in Iran. Hopefully this is the end of it.


Israel is known for upping the ante.
by EricCartman  (2024-04-14 08:54:11)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

What will you say when this symbolic act is met with 3x the force from Israel? Will you blame Israel for responding, or Iran for spinning the wheel of violence?

In response to the 10/7 attack, Israel has waged six months of war. What do you think that they will do in response to an unprecedented attack from Iran? Nothing doesn’t seem like it is on the table. So it is either attack their proxies in Southern Lebanon or attack Iran directly (logistically much more difficult, for sure).


Zero civilian casualties so far
by DBCooper  (2024-04-14 09:09:37)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Much different than 10/7


Maybe that matters. I don’t know.
by EricCartman  (2024-04-14 09:50:22)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

My point is that Israel isn’t known for restraint when it comes to these situations. Given the unprecedented nature of the attack, I can see them striking back much more forcefully to dissuade such action in the future.


Eh, I mean with Bibi who knows but
by ratinatux  (2024-04-14 10:05:35)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

if we are being objective Iran was probably within reason with this response — Israel blew ip up two of their generals. The trade of that strike for this futility seems like Israel should just take a win


Iran funds plenty of proxy groups that attack Israel.
by EricCartman  (2024-04-14 10:34:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Hezbollah being front and center. Hamas, too.

I’d say that Israel is justified in any attack on Iran, given their state sponsorship of terrirism in the region.