Notre Dame begins its grueling October schedule by hosting the Stanford Cardinal on Saturday afternoon. The rivalry between these teams has intensified during the last few years as both programs have regained national attention after several years of mediocre play, and both teams have sent numerous players to the NFL in recent drafts. The Cardinal are still miffed about a 20-13 overtime loss in 2012 where tailback Stepfan Taylor squirmed across the goal line about 20 minutes after being stopped and the game declared over. This year’s contest also promises to be competitive, hard fought and low scoring. National television coverage will be provided by NBC beginning at 3:30 PM Eastern time.
Stanford (3-1) enters the game ranked first nationally in total defense (198 ypg), passing defense (74 ypg) and scoring defense (6.5 ppg). Although they played two soft opponents in their first four games, they also battled two conference foes including USC, whom they held to 13 points. It is obvious from watching this unit perform that they are well coached, disciplined, and experienced. Eight starters are seniors or fifth year players. The Irish have only two, Joe Schmidt and Cody Riggs, unless Austin Collinsworth comes back to start at safety over Elijah Shumate.
Coach Brian Kelly’s team is still without five experienced players as of now (Thursday), who are scheduled to learn the results of the university’s academic integrity investigation in the next few days. At this point it seems reasonable to assume that none of the “Frozen Five” will play a significant part in this game regardless of any individual ruling. On the injury front, Notre Dame would like to have slot receiver Amir Carlisle back for this contest, but it is not yet known how much he will be able to contribute.
While both defenses have played well this season, the offenses have suffered from inconsistency and turnovers. Quarterbacks Everett Golson and Stanford’s Kevin Hogan will be in the spotlight. Both can run as well as throw, and each boasts a completion percentage of approximately 70% against two interceptions. Also in the spotlight are each team’s leading receiver and fastest player. Ty Montgomery is that player for the Cardinal, while Will Fuller has emerged as the game-breaker for the Irish.
NOTRE DAME’S OFFENSE vs. STANFORD’S DEFENSE
The Cardinal employ a 3-4 defensive alignment with good size at the ends and linebacker positions. Teams are generally unable to run wide against them as they get off blocks fairly well and do a good job of containment. The down linemen are all fifth year seniors in nose tackle Dave Parry and a pair of 6’5” ends in Henry Anderson and Blake Lueders. Aziz Shittu is a capable reserve in the rotation. Inside linebackers Blake Martinez and A.J. Tarpley lead the team in tackles, with outside men Kevin Anderson and James Vaughters right behind them.
The revamped Notre Dame offensive line will have problems with this group if they attempt slow developing running plays to the outside, and pass protection could also be a chore. Sophomore Peter Kalambayi has emerged as the team’s sack specialist, and he was the team’s most effective player last week in the win over Washington. The Irish must continue to improve in the running game and avoid continuous third and long situations that Stanford typically crushes.
The Irish will seek to find exploitable matchups in the passing game that will buy them an advantage. If Fuller, Carlisle and Chris Brown are on the field together, Golson should have some success. The Cardinal secondary is solid, however, lead by safety Jordan Richardson and cornerback James Lyons. This group limited a talented USC receiving corps to 135 yards and no touchdowns. Golson may need to scramble and improvise quite a bit on Saturday, but he should be sure to slide or get out of bounds when prudence dictates. The major strength of the Stanford pass rush is that they not only bring excellent pressure, but also manage to shut off any running lanes for the quarterback to escape.
A north-south running game, a fast tempo and play calling that departs from the predictable are the key ingredients to success. Scoring opportunities will be in short supply so Notre Dame must convert each one into points. The Cardinal are actually better against the pass this year than in stopping the run, so the Irish should not just default to the air attack. Stanford will try to protect against the short slants and flat passes with tight coverage and gamble that their rush will get to Golson before he has time to throw it deep. This strategy worked well against USC.
STANFORD’S OFFENSE vs. NOTRE DAME’S DEFENSE
The Cardinal scored only ten points on five trips inside the red zone against USC, and it cost them the ball game despite outgaining the Trojans by a substantial margin. Hogan has moved the team well in the middle of the field, but his completion rate declines closer to the goal line and field goal kicker Jordan Williamson is far from automatic. The best weapon for Stanford is wide receiver and all-purpose star Ty Montgomery, who can score from long range and make any red zone concerns irrelevant.
The base alignment for the Cardinal includes a fullback, tight end and two receivers. Montgomery is the main threat who discourages teams from loading the box with defenders to stop the run. Tight end Austin Hooper and receiver Devin Cajuste are competent and productive, while speedy Michael Rector is the third wideout on obvious passing downs. The rushing attack is similar to Notre Dame in that three running backs are used in a rotation. Kelsey Young, Barry Sanders and Remound Wright average more than five yards per carry and share the ball almost equally.
A powerful offensive line remains the key to Stanford’s overall success. Five members of the stellar 2012 recruiting class are the current starters, including left tackle Andrus Peat, guard Josh Garnett and right tackle Kyle Murphy. Fullback Lee Ward is an experienced lead blocker and one reason why the tailbacks often travel several yards before first contact. The Irish linebackers, including Joe Schmidt and Jaylon Smith, will have to be stout for what is certain to be a physical contest. Smith did not have a strong game against Syracuse but he will be needed at his best on Saturday.
Hogan is a legitimate threat to pick up big chunks of yards outside the pocket. At 6’4” 225, he still has the speed to break containment and pick up first downs. He also has a habit of making poor throws under pressure, but the Irish must be able to provide it. They must also make sure that Montgomery is not allowed to roam free in the secondary, so the plan must be to contain him and attempt to defend Stanford’s other less dangerous weapons.
SPECIAL TEAMS
Once again, Kyle Brindza gives the Irish a clear advantage over the opponent’s place kicker. For Stanford, Jordan Williamson is a mere four for eight in field goal attempts with a long of 35 yards and one block. If the game comes down to a battle of three-pointers, Brindza’s range and accuracy will be tough to beat. Equally important is Brinza’s ability to kick the ball deep enough or punt it high enough to neutralize Montgomery, who is a threat to score on returns or at least alter field position dramatically. In a battle where every yard will be contested, yards gained in the return game could create a scoring chance that spells the difference in the outcome.
Notre Dame started the season well as Cody Riggs showed an aptitude for returning punts and Carlisle was an above-average kick returner. The numbers since the opener against Rice have not nearly been as good, and the Irish need to have a better showing here. Needless to say, the coverage teams have to be disciplined and tackle crisply should Montgomery get a chance to run one back.
SUMMARY
Another slugfest is likely with a few scoring chances for each side that will be set up by a precious few big offensive plays, turnovers and special teams. The team that converts most of their opportunities will win, and touchdowns are going to be at a premium as opposed to field goals. Each senior quarterback can be very effective, but also capable of making a catastrophic mistake. The Irish hope that Golson got all of that out of his system last week with four turnovers against Syracuse.
The Irish need to defend Montgomery wherever he is on the field and do a credible job against the run. The Cardinal must crowd Notre Dame’s receivers and keep Golson in the pocket. If the Irish can establish an effective running game, slow down the pass rush and open up the entire field for their speedy athletes, they will prevail. Neither team will be able to convert third and long situations with any consistency, so the trick is to stay out of them.
Here are a few questions that will shed light on the outcome:
Which offensive line will best protect its quarterback?
Will Notre Dame be able to contain Montgomery?
Which offense will have a higher success rate on third down?
Can Stanford cover the speedy Irish receivers?
Which quarterback will refrain from turning over the ball?
Which special teams will win the battle of field position?
Which defense will make a critical stand with the outcome on the line?
PREDICTION
Both teams have advantages they can exploit to spell the difference in the game. The Cardinal offensive line and rushing attack make Hogan a more effective passer, and the defense simply does not make mistakes. Montgomery alone is good enough to be the difference if the Irish fail to blanket him. Notre Dame has the weapons to win individual matchups and put points on the board, but only if its offensive line can protect Golson and generate enough yards on the ground to make Stanford respect it. In the end, Golson should be able to leave last week’s mistakes behind and outplay Hogan, while Brindza will provide the winning margin.
NOTRE DAME 20 STANFORD 17
NDBonecrusher says:
John, as always, excellent and thorough. I would add a couple questions of my own:
-Which running attack will have the greatest success?
-What adjustments will BVG make to avoid mismatches against Montgomery, while not leaving Joe Schmidt out to dry against those gigantic Stanford linemen?
This will not be a high scoring contrast. This will be what we have come to expect from ND vs. Stanford: two real good, smart teams going toe to toe for a few hours with the outcome decided by a few “big chunk plays” that a hungry Golson will provide. ND 20, Stanford 14 (I subtracted a FG from your prediction because I don’t think their kicker is up to this challenge).
Camarillo Brillo says:
Why is it that I feel confident about ND games until I read Vannie’s preview?
a68domer says:
Sounds like a good overall assessment to me. I’ll take that final score but would prefer something closer to 35-17. GO IRISH!!
JDThom says:
Stanford’s defensive stats have been skewed by who they played (not just the lack of competition from UC Davis and Army but also Army’s lack of a passing game). I agree 21 for either team should be enough to win the game.
I also hope Golson avoids taking hard hits like he did in the 2012 game.
pc says:
I feel oddly confident heading into this matchup which is a somewhat new and scary feeling for me. I think that the Irish are yet to play an A game and Kelly will have them ready for this one from the start. Last year a completely mediocre Rees cost us a win in Stanford and I feel this Irish team is heads and tails better. The key is to get out early and force stanford to have to begin pass happy. If they can do this they can dominate the game. I predict an early big pass play or two which will help set up the ground game. Irish 27-13
randy says:
Unfair regarding Rees. He was a 22 yr old student. And how many of us were Division 1 athletes? As an alum, he’ll always be a part of the Notre Dame family, just like many of the rest of us. Coaches come and go, they either get statutes or they are largely forgotten. But students and alums should get a little slack and respect.
randy says:
Statues. Maybe statutes too, but that’s another story.
PanDomer73 says:
I agree with the final; Irish 27-13. We have a decisive advantage in Golson, and I’m beginning to think that Kelly is also on the rise as both coach and human being.
tjak says:
Washington took Stanford down to the wire; I think the Irish are a tad better then Washington. I think the Irish will handle a team that struggled against Washington. Irish win 31-17.
IRISHHAWK50 says:
The last time I checked the weather looked to be cold and rainy for the game. I think this might give ND an edge. I don’t think we should overlook the home field advantage either. Hopefully, Golson and the Irish come out confident. Didn’t like the look in Golson’s eyes at the start against Syracuse. I don’t think Stanford is as good as advertised. I hope ND is. ND 28-21.
FL Dan says:
One thing I have been really happy about this season is our 2nd half adjustments. Defense has played much better in the second half of every game. If we do put some points up early then the air heads at espn will be silenced, but ND loves to raise my blood pressure…so the game will be won in the last 4 min. LETS GO ND!
atlantadomer says:
Does Kevin Hogan still play for Stanford??? Oh he does??? 28-10 Irish
Fitz says:
This is the kinda game that feels like it could go to overtime. But I sure hope not. I’d much prefer a Michiganesque type stomping. One thing’s for sure it can’t be a sloppy fumble fest like it was last weekend. Glad this one is at home. Could be huge day for Brindza. Ready for Golson to rise up and look more Heismanish again.
Irish 23 -15.
Austinirish says:
This will be close – mistakes will decide. The Irish will need a few short fields to prevail. I look for Jaylon Smith to have a big game and provide the TOs. I think Vannie’s got it picked right.
GOND88 says:
This game will be a slug fest and Stanford will make ND earn every yard. If the cardinal succeeds in making ND’s attack one dimensional and if the ND O-line struggles in pass protection the day could be long. I hope Van Gorder continues to work his magic with scheming and blitzing. This should represent NDs’ first real test of the season.
And David Shaw is no ordinary coach. He’s also field marshal and Bradford M. Freeman director of football or as Bob Davie would say, footbaw.
Kev says:
Stanford is good but not as good as Notre Dame. ND is big boy football. Everett Golson is better than Hogan. ND 20- 13. ND defense shows up when we need them most and Brian Van Gorder does another fist pump up DAvid shaw’s behind. 🙂
Dslayer says:
That beautiful Southbend weather will be the key to an Irish victory over those boys from sunny California.
william dougher says:
go blue /gold nd
mrm says:
All indications are ND is better than last season and Stanford is not. Regarding Stanford’s tougher schedule, the lost at home to a USC team which lost to Boston College. Irish have too many quality receivers. Big day for Robinson, Fuller, and Hunter. Irish win!
mrm says:
How ’bout them Irish. Brian Van Gorder….. Kelly’s best recruit thus far!!!
NDBonecrusher says:
You said it, mrm! The D was the story today. Have a look at the stat sheet–amazing. If the season ended today BVG ought to get the award for best asst coach/coordinator.
irishhawk50 says:
A great win for the Irish. Another sub par game for Golson. I could have completed that pass to Koyack. He was wide open from the 10 yard line. The defense won the game. Stanford was totally out played. All that being said it was great to watch.
By the way, I can’t believe with all the help the NBC announcers get they couldn’t clearly see that Robinson’s hands were always under the football in that review.
Moe says:
Great win against a very strong cardinal defense (with the exception of a couple of fatal errors) and bad weather. ND’s defense was even better than Stanford’s and the offense was more effective than the score indicated. “Footbaw.” Harharhardeeharhar.