Fwiw, I ran the numbers on Louisville
by tf86 (2022-05-12 10:08:59)

In reply to: I realize that, but in my comparison, ND is + 3 mens sports  posted by NDoggie78


It seems to me that right now, they're out of compliance with Title IX, unless either: (1) there's something about the computations I'm not understanding; (2) they have a waiver; or (3) Title IX permits a bit of a fudge factor (I'd say this is more than likely, given that it would be nearly impossible to match these numbers completely. The question is, how big a fudge factor do they allow?) Either way, if they add men's lacrosse, they'd probably have to add two women's sports as well in order to make their Title IX numbers better.


I think when someone was running numbers before
by NDoggie78  (2022-05-12 12:21:12)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

all the teams being discussed seemed out of compliance including ND, but I may be mis-remembering and regardless, no one is asking us.


It looked to me like pretty much everyone is out of
by tf86  (2022-05-12 12:51:49)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Compliance, even Georgia Tech despite a very favorable male:female ratio for Title IX (61-39). I think there is something we're all overlooking, as we don't see any women's groups up in arms about this, as I think they would be if there was mass noncompliance. Maybe the fudge factor is much higher than any of us realize (just spitballing here, but a fudge factor of 10%, while high, is not entirely out of the question.)