I guess it's semantics.
by PeteatND (2019-02-04 12:28:45)

In reply to: That's not considered human error?  posted by NDBass

I'd say it wasn't so much an "error", as it was a manifestation of the horrible end-of-game ref'ing philosophy that seems to be endemic in professional sports.

I think we're all agreeing here, just stating it differently. I don't think it was corrupt, but I don't think it was just a simple "mistake", either.