You agree with what? That Texas fans think it was clean
by ACross (2020-02-01 00:28:53)

In reply to: I'd have to agree..  posted by TWO


Or that it was in fact clean?


I hope the former
by pmcdnd96  (2020-02-02 09:24:19)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I have seen worse hits, but that collision was the very definition of what both the NFL and NCAA are writing rules to eliminate:
-defenseless player
-contact initiated with helmet
-defensive player launched into the hit

I still have no idea how that wasn't called


I always think about how Holtz would have reacted.
by RagingBull  (2020-02-02 14:27:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I imagine he might have taken his team off the field.

If your players are in danger why continue? Because it's Notre Dame-Texas on national TV?

There is no debate as to whether multiple head injuries lead to long-term medical conditions. The issue is whether the rules as currently drafted serve the players enough.

If you don't enforce the rules why put your kids' health at risk?